Mike Baker
Mike Baker is a seasoned expert in cybersecurity and digital forensics with over 20 years of experience. A highly sought-after consultant and speaker, Mike has helped businesses, government agencies, and individuals safeguard their digital assets. He holds several certifications, including CISSP and CCFP, and earned a Master's in Cybersecurity from a top university. As the founder and CEO of CyberShield International, Mike leads a team of professionals dedicated to providing cutting-edge security solutions. He is also a prolific writer, contributing regularly to renowned tech journals and blogs, where he shares insights on emerging cyber threats, security best practices, and industry trends. Known for his approachable demeanor and ability to simplify complex concepts, Mike is a trusted voice in the cybersecurity community.
Books Mentioned on The Joe Rogan Experience (JRE) #2021 - Mike Baker & Joe Rogan
Book Title: Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives
Author: Siddharth Kara
Joe Speaks to Former CIA Officer Mike Baker About UFO Whistleblower's Claims
The topic of UFOs and extraterrestrial life has been a subject of fascination and debate for decades. In a recent interview on The Joe Rogan Experience, David Grush, a former military veteran and National Reconnaissance Office member, shared his perspective on the matter. Grush believes in the existence of UFOs and has spoken to enough people to support his belief. He also acknowledges the possibility of a government disinformation campaign to create an alternative narrative and obfuscate the truth.
Grush’s experience with the government has led him to believe that it can be dysfunctional and secretive. He questions why the government would engage in a covert action campaign to spread information about what they know, instead of simply keeping the program and its findings a secret. Grush suggests that the government may be creating more conversation and potentially drawing attention to the program, which could lead to government oversight and investigations into potential misappropriation of funds.
Belief in the Narrative
Mike Baker in the video believes that the information being discussed is legitimate and not fabricated. They state that the individual sharing the information, who has a military background, has likely talked to enough people and has personal experience with the subject matter to believe in what they are saying. Mike Baker does not think that the individual is intentionally spreading misinformation or exaggerating the truth.
However, Mike Baker also expresses skepticism about the government’s involvement in the matter. They believe that if the US government is indeed developing new technology, it would be more efficient to keep the program secret and avoid any unnecessary attention. Mike Baker suggests that the government’s involvement in spreading information about the topic could lead to further scrutiny and potential problems, such as accusations of misappropriation of funds.
Mike Baker’s instinct is to approach the subject matter with a logical and transparent mindset. They suggest that all reported cases should be examined and investigated thoroughly, and that transparency should be maintained throughout the process. Mike Baker believes that the current lack of transparency and the government’s refusal to disclose information may be contributing to the confusion and uncertainty surrounding the topic.
Despite his skepticism about the government’s involvement, Mike Baker remains open-minded about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. They believe that the vastness of space and the limitations of human imagination make it impossible to rule out the possibility of otherworldly beings. Mike Baker acknowledges that there have been credible sightings and reports of UFOs, and that the narrative surrounding the topic has shifted from being considered preposterous to being taken more seriously.
Overall, Mike Baker believes that a more transparent and logical approach is necessary to better understand the topic of UFOs and extraterrestrial life.
Government Dysfunctionality
Mike Baker in the video expresses his belief that the government can be dysfunctional at times. He argues that the government’s covert action campaign to spread information about their development of technology is unnecessary and can cause more problems than it solves. Mike Baker believes that the government should keep their program secret and avoid creating alternative narratives that can generate unwanted publicity or conversation, particularly in Congress.
Mike Baker suggests that the government should be more transparent about their investigations into anomalous sightings and provide more details about the 800 cases that the All Domain Anomalous or Anomaly Resolution Office has. He believes that the government should work through these cases and investigate the ones that cannot be explained.
Mike Baker acknowledges that the sheer act of talking about anomalous sightings is a good development as it provides an avenue for pilots to report their sightings and for the government to investigate them in a more logical and detailed manner. However, Mike Baker also notes that if the government is running a secret program, they would not want people talking about it and would not create a false narrative unless they had to.
Overall, Mike Baker believes that the government’s dysfunctionality can hinder their ability to investigate anomalous sightings and that more transparency and logical investigation is needed to solve the issue.
Disinformation Campaigns
Mike Baker in the video discusses the potential risks of disinformation campaigns regarding the UAP issue. They argue that if the US government is running a program to develop technology related to UAPs, it would be counterproductive to create a false narrative about it. This could lead to more conversation around the issue, potentially causing government oversight and scrutiny into the program’s funding.
Mike Baker suggests that a more logical approach would be to keep the program secret and avoid government oversight. They believe that the government’s dysfunctionality and tendency to keep secrets make it more likely that they would run a covert action campaign to spread disinformation. However, this would not be the best course of action.
Mike Baker argues that the government should be more transparent about the UAP issue, particularly in regards to the 800 cases that the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office has. They suggest that the government should work through these cases and investigate the ones that cannot be explained.
Mike Baker believes that the narrative around UAPs has shifted from being completely preposterous to credible, thanks to credible people like David Fravor and Ryan Graves. They suggest that this could lead to more transparency and investigation into UAPs, which would be a positive development. However, they caution that it is still possible that a disinformation campaign is being run to muddy the waters around the UAP issue.
Misappropriation of Funds
The US government’s covert action campaign to spread information about their development of technology related to UAPs could potentially lead to a misappropriation of funds investigation. This is a concern for those running the program as it could generate unwanted publicity and conversation, particularly on Capitol Hill. The government may be interested in pursuing the misappropriation of funds instead of the UAP issue itself. If the program is a US government development of technology, it would be best to keep the program secret and avoid creating an alternative narrative that could cause problems. The government’s dysfunctionality may lead to this misappropriation of funds investigation.
Investigative Approach
Mike Baker in the video believes that the US government’s approach to investigating Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) is not logical. He questions the need for a covert action campaign to spread information about what the government knows, when it would be easier to have the program and keep quiet about it. He suggests that this approach may lead to more conversation and scrutiny, potentially causing problems with government oversight and misappropriation of funds.
Mike Baker’s instinct is to solve the issue and come to a logical resolution. He suggests that the government should provide more transparency by disclosing the 800 cases in the All Domain Anomalous or Anomaly Resolution Office and working through them one by one. He believes that this approach could lead to more clarity and help to identify the few sightings that cannot be explained.
Mike Baker is not willing to rule out the possibility that some sightings could be otherworldly, as the infinite nature of space and our limited understanding of it makes it difficult to dismiss the idea. However, he also acknowledges that physical evidence is necessary for people to believe in it.
Overall, Mike Baker suggests that a more logical and transparent approach to investigating UAP could lead to more credibility and help to identify the few sightings that cannot be explained.
Unexplained Sightings
Mike Baker in the video discusses the issue of unexplained sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Mike Baker believes that there are credible reports of UAP sightings that cannot be easily explained. Mike Baker also mentions the existence of a covert action campaign to spread disinformation about what the government actually knows. Mike Baker suggests that the government should be more transparent about its investigations into UAP sightings.
Mike Baker acknowledges that some UAP sightings may have mundane explanations, but there are some that cannot be easily explained. Mike Baker mentions the technical data, such as video and radar lock, that have been collected in some instances. Mike Baker is not willing to rule out the possibility that some UAP sightings may be otherworldly.
Mike Baker also discusses the vastness of space and the limited capacity of humans to imagine what life outside of Earth could look like. Mike Baker believes that physical evidence is necessary to believe in the existence of crashed retrieval programs.
Mike Baker notes that the narrative about UAP sightings has shifted from being completely preposterous to being credible. Mike Baker suggests that transparency about UAP sightings may lead to more detailed investigations. Mike Baker also mentions the possibility of patriots who believe in the existence of UAPs.
Potential Obfuscation
Mike Baker in the video raises concerns about the possibility of potential obfuscation by the government regarding the UAP issue. They believe that the government’s actions in spreading information about what they know through a covert action campaign could be creating more conversation around the issue, leading to increased scrutiny from Congress. This, in turn, could result in an investigation into the misappropriation of funds, which is the last thing a government program would want.
Rather than engaging in a disinformation campaign, Mike Baker suggests that the government should keep the program a secret and avoid government oversight. They also suggest that the government should provide more transparency about the 800 cases reported by the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office and work through them systematically to identify any anomalies.
Mike Baker questions whether the government’s actions are meant to create confusion and obfuscation, or if they genuinely believe in what they are saying. They remain open to the possibility that some sightings may be otherworldly, but stress the need for physical evidence to support such claims.
Mike Baker believes that the current discussion around UAPs may eventually lead to more transparency and logical investigation by the government, which could help to dispel any potential obfuscation. However, they caution that if the government is running a secret program, they would not want people talking about it and would avoid creating a false narrative.
Exploration of Space
Mike Baker in the video, who has a background in the military and National reconnaissance office, believes that there could be more to the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon) sightings than what is being disclosed by the US government. Mike Baker suggests that the government’s approach to the UAP issue seems disorganized and potentially misleading.
Mike Baker questions the government’s decision to engage in a covert action campaign to spread information about what they know instead of simply having the program and keeping quiet about it. Mike Baker argues that this approach could lead to more conversation and scrutiny, including potential investigations into misappropriation of funds.
Despite the government’s lack of transparency, Mike Baker remains open-minded about the possibility of otherworldly explanations for the UAP sightings. Mike Baker acknowledges the vastness of space and the limited amount that humans have explored. However, Mike Baker also acknowledges the need for physical evidence to support claims of extraterrestrial life or technology.
Mike Baker believes that the recent shift in the narrative around UAP sightings, from preposterous to credible, may lead to more transparency and investigation. Mike Baker suggests that the government should take sightings reported by commercial or military pilots more seriously and investigate them in a more detailed and logical manner.
Overall, Mike Baker’s exploration of space raises questions about the government’s handling of the UAP issue and the possibility of extraterrestrial life or technology.
Crash Retrieval Programs
There has been much speculation about the existence of crash retrieval programs, which are believed to be covert operations aimed at recovering and reverse engineering crashed extraterrestrial spacecraft. However, despite numerous claims and rumors, no concrete evidence of such programs has ever been presented to the public.
David Grush, a former military veteran and National Reconnaissance Office employee, has claimed that he believes in the existence of these programs based on his conversations with insiders. He argues that if the US government is developing advanced technology, it would make more sense to keep the program secret and avoid creating unnecessary attention and government oversight.
However, others have pointed out that if such programs do exist, it is unlikely that they would be kept secret for so long without any leaks or whistleblowers. Moreover, the lack of concrete evidence or specific details about these programs raises doubts about their existence.
Despite the lack of concrete evidence, the topic of crash retrieval programs continues to generate interest and speculation among UFO enthusiasts and researchers. The recent shift in the narrative from complete disbelief to a more open-minded approach has led to increased public attention and calls for more transparency from the government regarding UFO sightings and related phenomena.
Shift in Narrative
The narrative surrounding UFOs and UAPs has shifted significantly in recent years. While it was once considered preposterous, there are now credible reports from military and commercial pilots, as well as other witnesses, that describe sightings of objects that defy our understanding of what a vehicle is capable of doing.
This shift in narrative has led to increased transparency and a greater willingness to investigate these sightings in a more logical and detailed manner. However, there are still concerns about the potential for a covert action campaign to spread disinformation and muddy the waters.
Despite this, there are those who believe that the truth about UFOs and UAPs will eventually come to light, either through commercial or military pilots reporting sightings or through continued investigation by the government.
Overall, the shift in narrative has led to a greater willingness to consider the possibility of extraterrestrial life and to investigate sightings in a more open and transparent manner.
Reporting Sightings
Mike Baker discusses the importance of transparency and logical investigation when it comes to reporting sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). He suggests that instead of creating a disinformation campaign, it would be easier for the government to simply have a program and keep it quiet. He also mentions the possibility of misappropriation of funds and the potential problems it could cause.
To solve the issue, Mike Baker proposes that the government should provide more transparency about the 800 cases that the All Domain Anomalous or Anomaly Resolution Office has. He suggests investigating those cases and crossing off mundane answers until only a few unexplainable ones remain. He believes that the narrative has shifted from being completely preposterous to credible, thanks to the multiple sightings reported by credible individuals.
Mike Baker acknowledges that there could be a secret program, but he believes that it is unlikely that the government would muddy the waters with a false narrative if it wasn’t necessary. He also mentions the possibility that there are patriots who believe in the existence of UAP and want to report their sightings. Overall, Mike Baker emphasizes the importance of transparency and logical investigation when it comes to reporting sightings of UAP.
Secret Program Theory
Mike Baker in the video questions the need for a disinformation campaign by the US government to spread information about the UAP phenomenon. They suggest that it would be more logical for the government to simply keep the program a secret and avoid government oversight. Mike Baker believes that creating an alternative narrative around the UAP issue could generate unwanted publicity and conversation, potentially leading to government investigations into the misappropriation of funds.
Mike Baker also suggests that the government’s lack of transparency and organization around the UAP phenomenon has led to confusion and skepticism among the public. They propose a more detailed and logical investigation of reported sightings, which could lead to greater transparency and understanding of the phenomenon.
Overall, Mike Baker remains open to the possibility that some UAP sightings may be otherworldly in nature, but emphasizes the need for physical evidence and logical investigation before making any conclusions.
Patriots' Perspective
From the perspective of Mike Baker in the video, they believe that the US government may be involved in a covert action campaign to spread information about the UAP issue. However, they do not think this is a tidy approach, as it could create more conversation and lead to government oversight. Mike Baker suggests that if the US government is developing technology related to UAPs, they should keep their program secret and avoid creating an alternative narrative that may cause problems.
Mike Baker’s instincts are to find a logical resolution to the UAP issue and to have more transparency about the cases being investigated. They suggest that the government should investigate the cases and work through them to find explanations for each one. Mike Baker believes that the UAP issue is worth pursuing, as it could lead to important discoveries about technology and life outside of Earth.
Mike Baker acknowledges that the vastness of space makes it difficult to imagine what life outside of Earth could look like. They also note that the narrative about UAPs has shifted from being preposterous to credible, with credible sources reporting multiple sightings that defy our understanding of what a vehicle is capable of doing.
Mike Baker suggests that the government should provide an avenue for commercial or military pilots to report UAP sightings and investigate them in a more logical and detailed manner. This could lead to more transparency about the UAP issue and provide important information about technology and life outside of Earth.
Classified Information
Mike Baker in the video discusses the possibility of a covert action campaign by the US government to spread disinformation about their development of technology and their knowledge of UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). Mike Baker believes that if the government is running a program to avoid government oversight, it would not create an alternative narrative that could generate publicity or conversation, particularly up on Capitol Hill. Mike Baker suggests that transparency and logical investigation of the 800 cases reported by the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office could lead to a better understanding of the UAPs. Mike Baker also acknowledges the possibility of otherworldly phenomena, but emphasizes the need for physical evidence before belief. Mike Baker notes that the narrative around UAPs has shifted from being completely preposterous to credible, and suggests that this may lead to more reporting and investigation in the future.
Witness Interviews Vs Direct Sightings
The discussion surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) has been ongoing for years, with witness interviews and direct sightings being two primary sources of information. Witness interviews involve speaking with individuals who have reported seeing something unusual in the sky, while direct sightings refer to cases where physical evidence, such as video footage or radar data, is available.
David Grush, a former military veteran, believes that the U.S. government may be involved in a covert action campaign to spread disinformation about UAP sightings. He argues that this approach is counterproductive, as it generates more conversation and scrutiny around the issue.
Despite the government’s potential involvement in disinformation campaigns, witness interviews and direct sightings continue to provide valuable information about UAP. However, the sheer number of reported cases can make it difficult to determine which sightings are credible and which are not.
To address this issue, some experts suggest that a more transparent and detailed investigation process is needed. This could involve providing more information about the 800 cases currently being investigated by the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or working to identify and investigate the handful of cases that cannot be easily explained.
Overall, while witness interviews and direct sightings can provide valuable information about UAP, the sheer number of reported cases and potential government involvement in disinformation campaigns make it difficult to determine the credibility of each sighting. A more transparent and detailed investigation process may be necessary to address these challenges.
Personal Encounters
Mike Baker in the video believes that the US government’s approach to handling the UAP issue is not tidy. They suggest that the government’s covert action campaign to spread information about what they actually know is unnecessary and only creates more conversation around the topic. Mike Baker thinks that it would be better to have a program and keep quiet about it.
The idea of a disinformation campaign and generating alternative narratives to avoid government oversight is not a good strategy according to Mike Baker. They believe that it could cause problems, such as a misappropriation of funds, which could lead to more scrutiny from Congress.
When asked about his instincts on the UAP issue, Mike Baker suggests that they would like to find a logical resolution to the matter. They propose that the all domain anomalous or anomaly resolution office should be more transparent about the 800 cases they have and work through them to find a solution. Mike Baker is not willing to close the door on the possibility of otherworldly beings, but they also acknowledge the vastness of space and the limitations of human imagination.
Mike Baker also discusses the narrative shift from UAP sightings being preposterous to being credible. They believe that the development of an avenue for commercial or military pilots to report sightings may eventually lead to more transparency and investigation into the matter. However, Mike Baker also acknowledges that if the US government is running a secret program, they would not want people talking about it and creating a false narrative.
Leaked Medical Records
The discussion between Joe Rogan and Mike Baker touched upon the possibility of a covert action campaign by the US government to spread information about their development of technology related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). The concern was that such a campaign could lead to government oversight and scrutiny, potentially exposing any misappropriation of funds. The conversation also highlighted the need for transparency in the investigation of UAP sightings.
Mike Baker suggested that the government should provide more information about the 800 cases that have been reported to the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, and work through them to identify any that cannot be explained. He also acknowledged the possibility that some sightings could be attributed to other countries’ technology development, but he was not willing to rule out the possibility of otherworldly origins.
The discussion also touched upon the vastness of space and the limited capacity of humans to imagine what life outside of Earth could look like. The narrative around UAP sightings has shifted from being completely preposterous to credible, and the conversation has led to increased reporting of sightings by commercial and military pilots.
Overall, the conversation highlighted the need for transparency and logical investigation of UAP sightings, and the potential risks associated with covert action campaigns by the government.