The controversy surrounding Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College in 2017 sparked a nationwide debate on free speech and academic freedom in higher education. The events that unfolded at the small liberal arts college in Washington State caught the attention of the media, the public, and academics alike. This article delves into the background of Bret Weinstein, the key events at Evergreen, and the wider implications for free speech and intellectual diversity in higher education.

bret weinstein and evergreen

The Rise of Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein, a former biology professor at Evergreen State College, gained national prominence after a series of events in 2017. With a PhD in Biology from the University of Michigan, Weinstein was known for his research on evolutionary biology and his passion for teaching. He joined Evergreen in 2003, where he developed a reputation for engaging students in critical thinking and fostering open dialogue in his classroom.

The Day of Absence Controversy

The Evergreen State College has long observed an annual event called the “Day of Absence.” The tradition, inspired by a play of the same name by Douglas Turner Ward, involved people of color voluntarily leaving campus for a day to underscore their importance to the community. In 2017, however, the college decided to reverse the event, asking white students, faculty, and staff to leave campus instead.

Bret Weinstein expressed concerns about the change in format, arguing that it was coercive and discriminatory to ask a specific racial group to leave campus based on their skin color. In a letter to the event’s organizers, Weinstein argued that the original Day of Absence promoted unity, while the new format could create division and hostility. The letter was leaked and circulated among the campus community, igniting a firestorm of controversy.

The Fallout at Evergreen

The backlash against Bret Weinstein’s stance on the Day of Absence was swift and severe. Students accused him of racism, demanding his resignation and staging protests on campus. The situation escalated as student activists occupied college buildings, leading to confrontations with faculty members and campus police.

Evergreen State College’s administration was criticized for its handling of the situation. Instead of supporting Weinstein’s right to express his opinion, they appeared to capitulate to the demands of the protesters. The college president, George Bridges, eventually agreed to several of the protesters’ demands, including mandatory anti-bias training for faculty and staff.

The situation garnered national attention, with the story of Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College becoming emblematic of the growing tension between free speech and social justice activism on college campuses. Critics argued that the college’s response was an affront to academic freedom and free speech, while supporters of the protesters saw Weinstein’s stance as indicative of systemic racism in higher education.

The Aftermath and Impact on Higher Education

The fallout from the Bret Weinstein and Evergreen controversy had lasting effects on both the professor and the college. Weinstein and his wife, Heather Heying, who was also a professor at Evergreen, resigned from their positions and reached a $500,000 settlement with the college. Evergreen experienced a decline in enrollment and was forced to make budget cuts, with some attributing these issues to the negative publicity surrounding the controversy.

The story of Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College became a focal point for discussions on free speech, academic freedom, and the role of higher education institutions in fostering intellectual diversity. Critics of Evergreen argued that the college had failed to uphold the principles of open inquiry and debate, opting instead to prioritize ideological conformity.

The incident also highlighted the increasing polarization of the political climate on college campuses. Many saw the treatment of Weinstein as evidence of a growing intolerance for dissenting opinions, especially on issues related to race and social justice. This intensified scrutiny on higher education led to an increased emphasis on the importance of free speech and intellectual diversity as essential components of a thriving academic environment.

Bret Weinstein's Continuing Influence

Since leaving Evergreen, Bret Weinstein has continued to be a prominent voice in the free speech debate. He co-founded the “Intellectual Dark Web,” a loose affiliation of academics, journalists, and public intellectuals who champion free speech and open dialogue on controversial topics. Through his podcast, “The DarkHorse Podcast,” Weinstein explores a range of issues, including evolution, politics, and culture, with guests who hold diverse perspectives.

Weinstein’s experiences at Evergreen have also informed his advocacy for reforms in higher education. He has called for increased transparency in college admissions and hiring practices, as well as a renewed emphasis on intellectual diversity and open inquiry in the classroom.

Add Your Heading Text Here

The story of Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College serves as a cautionary tale for higher education institutions. It underscores the need to protect free speech and academic freedom, while also grappling with complex issues of race and social justice. As colleges and universities continue to navigate these challenging issues, the lessons learned from the Evergreen controversy can provide valuable insights.

The case of Bret Weinstein and Evergreen highlights the importance of fostering an environment where diverse perspectives can be heard and debated without fear of retribution or censorship. In doing so, institutions of higher learning can promote intellectual growth, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth, which are the hallmarks of a well-rounded education.

Moreover, the events at Evergreen have sparked conversations about the balance between promoting diversity and inclusion and upholding the principles of free speech and academic freedom. As higher education institutions grapple with these tensions, it is essential to remember that open dialogue, tolerance for dissenting opinions, and a commitment to intellectual diversity are crucial for the continued success and relevance of the academy.

In the end, the story of Bret Weinstein and Evergreen State College serves as a reminder of the need to cultivate a campus climate that is both inclusive and supportive of free expression. By embracing these core principles, colleges and universities can create an environment where all members of the community can engage in the pursuit of knowledge and contribute to the greater good.