Skip to content
Transcript-backed recommendation · Amazon search results
Back to books
Why this book comes up
Book

Kylo versus United States

Mentions1
Episodes1
Podcasts1

Listen before buying

Kylo versus United States comes up on Interesting Times with Ross Douthat, with transcript quotes, timestamps, and episode context.

Kylo versus United States appears 1 time across 1 podcast episode on 1 show, with transcript quotes and timestamps.

one of the famous cases, it's an example I use in the book, is Kylo versus United States, which presented the question of whether infrared technology to detect heat in a building for purposes of detecting whether someone was growing marijuana illegally, whether that was a search.

Best episode to start with
Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era on Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
Why people keep bringing this up

The host discusses the case of Kylo versus United States to illustrate how originalist judges interpret constitutional phrases like 'unreasonable search and seizure.' This case serves as a pivotal example of how historical context and legal definitions are essential in understanding constitutional law.

Kylo versus United States most often appears in conversations about originalism and legal interpretation.

Recent linked podcasts include Interesting Times with Ross Douthat, giving you a quick path from the book back to the shows where it actually came up.

Recommendation signals

The host discusses the case of Kylo versus United States to illustrate how originalist judges interpret constitutional phrases like 'unreasonable search and seizure.' This case serves as a pivotal example of how historical context and legal definitions are essential in understanding constitutional law.

Best for
law students and legal professionals
Where it keeps coming up

Recent show rotation: Interesting Times with Ross Douthat.

Fastest path back to the source: the strongest indexed mention lands at 16:19 in the episode where we captured it.

Quick answers

Quick FAQ

Answers to common book, episode, podcast, and guest questions.

Which episode mentioned Kylo versus United States?

Amy Coney Barrett Is Looking Beyond the Trump Era on Interesting Times with Ross Douthat is one of the clearest indexed episodes that mentioned Kylo versus United States. The first indexed transcript timestamp lands at 16:19.

Which podcast mentioned Kylo versus United States?

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat is the main indexed podcast currently tied to Kylo versus United States.

Who mentioned Kylo versus United States on podcasts?

PodcastMentions ties Kylo versus United States to Interesting Times with Ross Douthat, but the underlying mentions do not yet expose stable guest names for every episode.

Why do podcast guests bring up Kylo versus United States?

The host discusses the case of Kylo versus United States to illustrate how originalist judges interpret constitutional phrases like 'unreasonable search and seizure.' This case serves as a pivotal example of how historical context and legal definitions are essential in understanding constitutional law. It most often appears in conversations about originalism and legal interpretation.

Source material

Mentions across episodes

Every mention card links back to the episode page and exact transcript anchor.

One of the famous cases, it's an example I use in the book, is Kylo versus United States, which presented the question of whether infrared technology to detect heat in a building for purposes of detecting whether someone was growing marijuana illegally, whether that was a search.

Sentiment: Deep Dive
For: law students and legal professionals
Key quote: one of the famous cases, it's an example I use in the book, is Kylo versus United States, which presented the question of whether infrared technology to detect heat in a building for purposes of detecting whether someone was growing marijuana illegally, whether that was a search.
The host discusses the case of Kylo versus United States to illustrate how originalist judges interpret constitutional phrases like 'unreasonable search and seizure.' This case serves as a pivotal example of how historical context and legal definitions are essential in understanding constitutional law.